There were a number of recent articles – of which we pick on ones from La Republica and Dinero from last week – to say that Colombian investors were streaming out of Ecopetrol and into Pacific Rubiales. The reasons were increases in Pacific Rubiales’ production and reserves, flat reserves and concerns about production in 1Q13 for Ecopetrol. All this is true so the logic is impeccable. The graph shows that perhaps investors are not as responsive to this logic as the articles suggests.
Pacific and Ecopetrol have been fighting over an escalation clause in the Quifa contract for over a year now. In late March, the day before Pacific was to publish its 2012 annual results, an arbitration board ruled in favor of Ecopetrol. After weeks of saying that there were legal avenues to be explored and pointing out that the arbitration board specifically stepped away from ordering the company to pay, Pacific now says they will honor the decision.
We present two stories, both related and unrelated, about small but important good works in producer communities. These were not reported by the national press but by local newspapers, the most direct form of communication with the people most affected by oil and gas operations.
At a recent conference in Cartagena, MinMinas Renjifo gave a ‘state of the industry’ speech. We did not care much for what he said about policy (see several articles last week) but this MinMinas press release is part of a necessary campaign to remind Colombians of the benefits of a well-running energy and mining sector. Translated and with comments by Hydrocarbons Colombia.
As reported by Caracol Radio, Congress will discuss the lawsuit between Ecopetrol and Pacific Rubiales for Quifa field exploitation. According to Senator Jorge Enrique Robledo, Pacific cannot refuse to pay Ecopetrol 1.5M oil barrels (equivalent to US$382M), after the Colombian courts ruled in favor of Ecopetrol.
Chilean operator with participation from Korean industrial giant LG has published its first set of annual results after purchasing Winchester Luna and Hupecol in early 2012. From a corporate perspective all of its absolute indicators are up significantly because of success in Chile and the acquisition of significant production in Colombia. However, as the graph shows, EBITDA margins in Colombia are poorer than the Colombian average (which was pulled down by poor results at Canacol) and much poorer than the company’s operations in Chile.